Epistemic Network Analysis

See how ideas connect.

ENA models how concepts connect in discourse and practice, making patterns of thinking visible and comparable. ENA was proposed and developed by researchers and developers from Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Dr. Peter Hu Dongpin is the Initiator of the open access ENA Hub of Knowledge.

ENA

Conceptual network model

EvidenceDesignIdentityPracticeReflection
An illustrative ENA graph. Nodes represent coded concepts and line weight represents relative connection strength.

Open tools · Transparent methods

An open path from coded evidence to interpretable networks.

Open coded CSV or XLSX data directly in your browser, define the analysis, inspect two-dimensional network comparisons, and take the model specification and results with you.

  1. Open by design

    Free to enter and powered by the open jENA runtime, so the research workflow is not locked inside a proprietary analysis shell.

  2. Local by default

    Your source CSV or XLSX file is processed in this browser. The Open ENA workspace has no data-upload endpoint.

  3. Reproducible in practice

    Export model choices, diagnostics, figures, and the evidence boundaries needed to explain how a result was produced.

Open ENA webtool

Open ENA keeps the method visible: visual separation or a thicker edge is not, by itself, evidence of statistical significance.

Open ENA browser research workspaceAn interface illustration showing coded data, model controls, a central comparison network, primary and secondary plots, and a reproducibility export in one connected workspace.OPEN ENABROWSER RESEARCH WORKSPACELOCALMODELENA configurationUNITWINDOWCODESCOMPARISON2D ENAPRIMARYSECONDARYDATAMODELCOMPARISONEXPORT
Interface concept: data, model choices, comparison plots, and reproducibility exports remain connected in one browser workspace.

A relational workflow

From coded data to a network model

ENA keeps theory, qualitative evidence, mathematical modeling, and visual interpretation connected throughout an analysis.

Frame the question

Define the phenomenon, analytic units, and the context in which connections are meaningful.

Code the evidence

Represent relevant ideas, actions, or practices with a transparent coding scheme.

Model co-occurrence

Accumulate connections among codes within the selected conversational or temporal window.

Compare structures

Interpret network patterns alongside the underlying qualitative evidence and research design.

Researcher × developer co-creation

Bring a research question, not a code package.

Bring the research question and methodological insight. Co-design the specification, evidence, and software with Dr. Peter Hu.

Learn the method before reading the graph.

Start with the analytic choices that give each node, connection, and comparison its meaning.